Tag Archives: Slavery

SERMON: Proceeding Fearfully

A Sermon by the Rev. Dr. Arthur M. Suggs
Preached on the Feast Day of Saints Peter and Paul, June 24, 2018.

A Feast Day for Saints Peter and Paul;
 A Gesture for Friendship, but no
 Reconciliation or Union Arises.

Today is the feast day for Saints Peter and Paul. This is observed not so much by Protestants but more by the liturgical traditions, Roman Catholics, Episcopalians, and so forth.

Don’t expect a real feast, but the occasion is a commemoration of their martyrdom under the reign of Nero in Rome.

It is a special day for Roman Catholics in particular because this is when representatives of the Eastern Orthodox church travel to Rome to be with the pope as they celebrate this important day.

It is a token gesture toward friendship renewal, although not anywhere close to reconciliation or union, which was broken during the Eleventh Century when Pope Leo IX in Rome demanded allegiance from the independent Eastern church in Constantinople. Rome will return the favor on the feast day of Saint Andrew in the autumn by sending a delegation to Istanbul.

Most of you probably don’t generally care much about such ecclesiastical matters.

I only care minimally, but I thought you might find the Great Schism of 1054 interesting.

Gestures toward friendship where there has been enmity for over a millennium are important, and actually could be of great importance.

In addition, I thought it might be an opportune time to look at some of the teachings of Saints Peter and Paul on this revered feast day.

Team of Rivals Is a Fascinating
 Moment in History; Creative
 Genius Springs up in Both Camps.

First, I need to tell you about some facts I learned from a marvelous book I have been reading. In 2005, Doris Kearns Goodwin published Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln.

“The book is a biographical portrait of Lincoln and some of the men who served with him in his cabinet from 1861 to 1865. Three of his cabinet members had previously run against Lincoln in the 1860 election: Attorney General Edward Bates; Secretary of the Treasury, Salmon P. Chase; and Secretary of State, William H. Seward. The book focuses on Lincoln’s mostly successful attempts to reconcile conflicting personalities and political factions on the path to abolition and victory in the American Civil War.” — Wikipedia

It is, of course, a fascinating moment in our history.

But there is one facet to the story that left me utterly astounded. It had to do with the creative genius, not of Lincoln, but rather of the men who didn’t want to give up slavery, and envisioned a dozen or so different ways to thwart, eviscerate, delay, or otherwise prevent abolition.

Here are three quick examples:

1. Let’s make abolition a “states’ rights” thing, where, rather than a national law, let the states decide, some allowing it and others not allowing it.

2. Let’s keep the slaves for the time being. However, on a given date, sometime in the future, children born to slaves would be free.

3. The U.S. Constitution already had language to the effect that those who were bound in some way were to be accounted as three-fifths of a person.

Proponents of this lunatic but serious stunt tried to find a way to grant to slaves some of the rights of free people, but just not all of them.

Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution reads: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons. (Boldface type added.)

A position somewhere between 100 percent legal slavery and 0 percent legal slavery was propounded by various politicians who envisioned a dozen or so different ways to land somewhere in the middle, to avoid the theological, legal, and moral statement that slavery should no longer exist in our land.

Southern Politicians Also Show
 Creative Genius; Peter and Paul
 Show Holy Spirit Within People.

As I read Goodwin’s book, I felt historically naïve. In my grade-school imagination, I somehow thought it came down to a vote of whether to have slaves or not.

That would have been so simple. But rather, it was this extraordinarily difficult political process of withstanding all those many “reasonable” compromises — compromises that made garnering the necessary votes more likely easier, but that stopped short of ridding the land of slavery.

What astounded me was the creative genius of southern politicians in coming up with those gutless, halfhearted, and morally deficient compromises. It was their genius pitted against Lincoln’s genius.

I see the same genius at play in the way in which human beings avoid some of the clear teachings of Peter and Paul.

I will happily acknowledge that both Peter and Paul wrote many things that are difficult to swallow.

Both Peter and Paul were completely and profoundly dualistic in their view of the world and specifically what a human being is — that is, both sinner and saint.

(Sometimes it’s hard-core sinners capable at least of being a saint, and at other times it’s saintly people lapsing into sinnerdom.)

On this feast day, however, let me at least point out some of the things the two apostles said about you and me, four of them:

  1. Paul — I Corinthians 6: 18: “Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, which you have from God, and that you are not your own.”
  2. Paul — Galatians 3: 26-29: “For in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith. As many of you as were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to the promise.”
  3. Paul — II Corinthians 3: 18: “And all of us, with unveiled faces, seeing the glory of the Lord as though reflected in a mirror, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another; for this comes from the Lord, the Spirit.”
  4. Peter — II Peter 1: 3-4: Then comes the important one. “His divine power has given us everything needed for life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness.

Thus he has given us, through these things, his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may escape from the corruption that is in the world because of lust, and may become partakers in the divine nature.”

The Church Understands Spiritual
 Worth of Humanity; 19 Authors
 Thwart, Eviscerate, Delay, Prevent.

In preparation for this sermon, I’ve been reading a book entitled Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions.

It is a compilation of essays edited by a pair of Methodists from Drew University, Michael J. Christensen and Jeffery A. Wittung. It’s a comprehensive collection of 19 essays by Eastern Orthodox authors, some by Roman Catholics, some by Protestants.

Never have I been so enticed by the promise of a good book. That is how the church in all its variety has understood such passages as I just read pointing to all the supreme spiritual worth of every human being.

The volume focuses on a theological understanding of what the Church Father Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, said so many centuries ago, “For the Son of God became man so that we might become God.”

Never have I been so utterly let down upon reading this book to realize that the authors would all have made excellent compromising politicians in finding new and creative ways to keep slavery.

The words that I used before — thwart, eviscerate, delay, prevent — that’s what the 19 authors did to those passages.

Let’s look at the three passages for a moment:

You are a temple of the Holy Spirit. At a minimum, that means that the God of the Universe, however you conceive of such an entity, dwells within you, abides with you. Perhaps not limited by you, by any stretch, but fully present inside your very being.

• You are a child of God. At a minimum, that means that you are of the same species — parents don’t give lives to a kid that’s of a different species. Whatever divinity is, that’s what you are also, at least in some mystical sense. It also means a relationship with parents and children, in which the child is unbelievably precious to the parent.

We are being transformed into the same image of God. One of the great mystical teachings of virtually every religion is that we are made in the image of God, “imago Dei” in Latin. B’tselem elohim in Hebrew.

I did my entire doctoral dissertation on what it might mean to be created in the image of God. The word for transformation is “metamorphosis.”

In your own mind, try to get a feeling for what this verse might be saying. At a minimum, we are metamorphosing back into that primal, Edenic image of God, fueled by the Spirit dwelling within and further fueled by our royal status as children of God.

• We are partakers of the divine nature. At minimum, this means . . . Wow!

Do We Believe Any of This Stuff?
 Don’t Be Afraid to Embrace Who 
You Are; Love Yourself and Others.

Old Olive Tree Inside a Monastery. Interior of the Emmaus Benedictine Monastery (Emauzy or Emauzský klášter) – abbey in Prague.

Or do we instead believe the narrative that we are miserable sinners, lucky to be getting by?

Chances are that we are somewhere in the middle.

Actually in the middle, just like those politicians trying to preserve some semblance of slavery.

And I’m going to soften my tone about them. It may be the case that they were just afraid. Perhaps some of them were genuinely mean people, who simply didn’t care about an African man or woman, let alone their children. Perhaps a few of them really believed they were subhuman, somewhere around three-fifths.

But I doubt that was true of all those politicians. Rather, they might have been afraid. They might have been thinking . . .

“We won’t be able to get this passed unless we compromise. Everybody knows that.”

“If we get rid of the slaves, it might bring financial ruin upon half the country.”

“If we pass abolition, it might unleash an angry and violent mob of Africans upon the white population. They will want revenge.”

It might have been they were afraid, and in their fear all those potential compromises have a certain appeal.

Don’t be afraid to embrace fully who you are: a Temple for the Spirit, a child of God, being transformed into the full image and glory of the Divine, and a partaker of the Divine Nature.

That is who you fully are, and once you embrace who you fully are then realize that this is also true of the next person of a different race, a different gender, a different class, a different orientation.

It is because we do not fully embrace who we are that all the isms exist at all. If we can’t see it in ourselves, how can we see it in others?

Embrace who you are. Love yourself. And then love others as yourself.

Amen.

Download or view the Proceeding Fearfully sermon as a PDF.

Featured Image credit: Dove with Olive Branch, universal symbol of peace and Holy Spirit. PD image courtesy of George Bog, Wiki.

SERMON: The Good Book (Pt. 1) – Enlightening the Eyes

A Sermon by the Rev. Dr. Arthur M. Suggs
for the First Sunday of Lent, February 18, 2018

This is the first of a new series of sermons on The Good Book. Here is an excerpt from Enlightening the Eyes:

The Rev. Dr. Art Suggs begins this Lenten sermon about the origins, translations and challenges of interpreting scripture with two stories — The second story based on an awkward moment that occurred during a spiritual discussion group gathering in his backyard.

Rev. Suggs begins, though, with “a sweeping story that I’m quoting from Peter Gomes, formerly a chaplain at Harvard, who wrote a book under the title of The Good Book that I have also used as an overall name for this new series of sermons.”

The ‘sweeping story’ points to the original, admirable, virtue-centered intentions of the Puritans coming to create a ‘new model of Christianity’ in this new world.

You’ll find this ‘sweeping story’ in the full sermon (download link below), but for now, Rev. Suggs continues,

“We’re going to be looking at:

• uses and abuses of the Bible,

• the Bible and women,

• the Bible and homosexuality,

• the Bible and money (that will be interesting),

… and core principles. The series will then take us all the way through to Easter, when we’re going to look at the Bible and miracles.

Bible 101

The Bible used by Abraham Lincoln for his oath of office during his first inauguration in 1861. PD image by Michaela McNichol, Library of Congress.

Where should I begin? I wrestled with this because it’s logical to start at the beginning, and there are some fascinating stories about how the Bible came to be.

This is particularly true 
for the New Testament, up to the time of Constantine, when he finally pressed the bishops to get their act together and decide what’s scripture and what’s not. Constantine and the bishops did decide, and that led to the whole issue of Rome and the Middle Ages.”

In the full sermon, the Rev. Dr. Suggs shares more about how the bible came into being, and the various translations of it, about which he adds,

“Translations would be fun to go over in a sermon, but I can tell that you’ve had enough. There are great stories about translation in a different way.

For example, in Hebrew, there’s only one word for both “palace” and “temple.” Try to imagine that for a minute. To get a feeling for how closely church and state were united in ancient Hebrew culture, they didn’t even bother to have different words for the two of them.

Context was the only way that you could tell whether someone was talking about the palace or the temple.

Here’s where it gets tough if you want to know a problem in translation: That is, there is no one word for sexual deviancy. How do we translate that? Somebody came up with the term homosexuality, and that word for sexual deviancy, generalized, became very specifically “homosexuality” for centuries.

A Bible handwritten in Latin, on display in Malmesbury Abbey, Wiltshire, England. The Bible was written in Belgium in 1407 AD, for reading aloud in a monastery. Photo by Adrian Pingstone. PD Wikimedia.

Thus, all the versions of the Bible based upon generalized sexual deviancy continued to use the word “homosexuality,” even though the deviance might actually have little or nothing to do with homosexuality.

For example, what would sexual deviancy have been in ancient Greek culture? Generally, it’s considered one of three things: Somehow or other, it was sex mixed in with violence like rape or bestiality or pedophilia. But no, it was decided that the best thing to do was just to call it homosexuality, therefore creating some of the pain and anger and hatred of the church by the homosexual community for centuries because of unwise and unthoughtful translations.

There’s great teaching about the organization of the Bible. You have the Torah and then the writings and the prophets in the Old Testament.

Saint Paul Writing His Epistles, 16th-century painting, c1618-1620, Valentin de Boulogne, Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, TX. PD Wikimedia.

In the New Testament you have the gospels and then Acts, which is sort of like Volume 2 of the Gospel of Luke and written by the same person, in all probability. Then follow the Pauline Epistles, and the scribes didn’t know whether Paul wrote Hebrews or not, so they tacked Hebrews at the end of what they thought were the Pauline Epistles.

Then it was followed by the general epistles, Titus, Timothy, Peter, James, and John and their shorter letters, followed by the book of Revelations.

We also have the Apocrypha, a whole bunch of other scriptures that come from the latter years but before Christ. These were accepted by the Catholics but generally not by the Protestants. And then, of course, the Gnostic documents came to light in the 20th Century from the discoveries of the Qumran and the Dead Sea Scrolls.

What Ended My Long Love Affair 
with the Bible?

To speak personally, I have had a long love affair with the Bible. I have studied it. I have memorized many verses. I learned Greek and Hebrew, and got an A in Greek and 100 in Hebrew, meaning that I did perfectly on every homework assignment and every test. I was the only one. I bought commentaries. I have preached from the Bible faithfully for over 30 years.

One thing I haven’t mastered: Some of my fellow students told me you need to preach with one hand and hold the Bible in the other, and you must buy a very expensive, floppy, leather-bound King James Version of the Bible, and you need to be able to grab it and flip it open. You need to flip it open to the middle, and I can’t do it to save my soul because you open up to the middle, and 
then you hold it while you’re preaching, regardless what verse it opened to. I never could learn the lesson.

So I’ve had a love affair with the Bible, but the love affair actually ended due to unfaithfulness.

It was all about three forms of unfaithfulness. One had to do with women, one had to do with gays, and one had to do with slaves. It is crystal clear that the Bible treats women in a second-class way.

It is also crystal clear that the Bible believes homosexuality is a sin. There are places where the text doesn’t use the word for sexual deviancy, but they describe it. A man with a man, for example, and they condemn it.

St. Peter Preaching in the Catacombs. Jan Styka, PD Wikimedia.

And it was hard for me to come to this decision, but I have decided that the Bible is just plain wrong. Men and women are to be treated equally, no matter what, and this is especially true in church. Women are not to be kept silent. They are not to have to cover their heads. They are to be treated equally with men.

Science has shown in so many different ways that there is a Bell curve of different types of sexuality, not just in human beings but across the mammalian phyla. Homosexuality is found in well over 400 different versions of mammals, not just among human beings.

And so the Bible is wrong. It’s just plain wrong. I will not preach from those passages ever again.

To Be Fair, the Bible Is a Product
 of Time and Place. We Divorced,
 Nevertheless Remain Amicable

Every single culture out of which the Bible emerged — ancient Hebrew, ancient Greece, ancient Israel — was anti-woman, anti-gay, and pro-slavery. So of course, it’s going to reflect that kind of moral compass.

The Second Letter of Paul to Timothy, 3: 16-17 says:

“All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.”

And I have been hit over the head whenever I have expressed my doubts with that verse. “All scripture,” it says, and it’s infuriating. It brings tears to my eyes.

Because what do you think scripture meant at the time that it was written? It meant the Torah. The first five books, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. It might have meant maybe the Prophets as well and things like the Psalms and the Proverbs, but it probably meant the Torah.

I’m being beaten over the head because I expressed doubt about a New Testament document.

A page from the Gutenberg bible. Scanned by Ransom Center of the University of Texas at Austin. PD Wikimedia.

In that love-affair analogy, we fell in love, 
we got married, and we had many happy years. But then there was this emerging unfaithfulness, and so we divorced but in an amicable way. We became friends, and we shall remain friends, at least from my end, to my dying day.

I look with amusement at churches in particular that like to venerate the Bible.

For example, some churches have processions in which the Bible is held high, while somebody walks around with it. There are churches that want you to stand when the gospel is read, and you can stay seated for the rest of it, 
for some reason. There are churches that emphasize the red-letter edition of the Bible because what Jesus says is more important than what other Biblical figures have to say.

There are churches that put the Bible on the communion table and show that it is precious and worthy of being on the communion table. And of course, there are some people who make sure that, in a stack of books, the Bible is always on top.

My present understanding after all these years is that the Bible is a fine tool, but like any kind of tool there are things for which it’s useful and other things for which it’s useless.

The Buddha told a story when some of his disciples wanted to venerate his words. (Find the Buddha’s story in the full version of this sermon – download below.)

I would answer, “Like a makeshift raft, the answer is yes, it does do that, not perfectly, not completely, not always reliably, but yes, it does.”

The passage that Judy Giblin read during the Lectionary was the beautiful and eloquent Psalm 19, verses 1-10 and 14.

Here, she reads again the central portion of it, verses 7 through 10:

“The law of the Lord is perfect, 
 reviving the soul;

the decrees of the Lord are sure, 
 making wise the simple;

the precepts of the Lord are right, 
 rejoicing the heart;

the commandment of the Lord is 
 clear, enlightening the eyes;

the fear of the Lord is pure, 
 enduring for ever;
the ordinances of the Lord are true 
 and righteous altogether.

More to be desired are they than 
 gold, even much fine gold;
sweeter also than honey, 
 and drippings of the honeycomb.”

Amen.

Download the full Enlightening the Eyes sermon (PDF)

** *The series title of The Good Book is borrowed from Peter Gomes’ book by the same title.
**The raft parable appears in the “Alagaddupama” Sutta of the Sutta-pitaka (Majjhima Nikaya 22).

Featured Image Credit: The Gutenberg Bible, 1455, Johann Gutenberg; Rare Books Division, the Lenox Library. Image by Kevin Eng, CC-PD Wikimedia.